Showing posts with label financial markets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label financial markets. Show all posts

Thursday, March 29, 2007

A market correction is coming, this time for real

"A Market Correction is Coming....."

This comment, "A market correction is coming, this time for real," comes from William Rhodes, senior vice-chairman of Citigroup, and chairman, president and chief executive of Citibank. Consistent with the headline, Rhodes takes a bearish view (in fact, he says he has been concerned about leverage and indiscriminate pricing of risk for some time, and said he expected a market correction a year ago. Now not only does he say he expects a "market correction" in the next 12 months, but a "real correction," which presumably means a correction in the real economy (does that mean a recession, or merely a marked fall in growth?).

It's noteworthy that someone in a senior position in a major financial institution is forecasting a pessimistic (actually, quite pessimistic by the standards of this sort of thing) outlook for growth. And he was downbeat late last spring, and admits to having been premature. Now some financial services firms have bearish spokesmen they keep around (think Stephen Roach at Morgan Stanley, who is always worth listening too, even when he is wrong), so perhaps that is one of Rhodes' roles. But the pernabear function is generally occupied by an economist doing market or economic forecasts, not a member of management. So it's pretty certain Rhodes believes what he is saying (it's not a house view) and it's also pretty certain that it's at least in part based on information that is not widely reported (someone like Rhodes either talks directly to or is one step removed from top corporate executives, very wealthy individuals, central bankers, regulators, other senior bank executives, and major investors).

So while this is one man's view, he is likely to have better access to information than many of the pros....

The recent market turmoil should not have been un­expected. We are living in an increasingly interdependent world. Times have been good, even with the volatility of the past few weeks sparked by the Shanghai market and then fuelled by the subprime sector in the US. We have been living in extraordinary times in a global “Goldilocks” economy – not too hot, not too cold. The macro-economy still looks pretty good but the shaking of the trees over the past few weeks has, it is to be hoped, awakened investors and lenders to the risks in the marketplace.

High growth in emerging markets continues, as exemplified by the tremendous growth in China and India. Western and eastern Europe are growing. The Russian economy, driven by energy, has been strengthened well beyond what was expected a few years ago. The Middle Eastern oil-exporting countries are going through a boom fuelled by oil and gas: it is different from earlier periods of high oil prices because this time a substantial amount of the money is staying in the region, rather than being invested elsewhere as in the 1970s.

Africa is in many ways going through something of an economic renaissance. The Japanese economy also has improved and the US locomotive has continued, maintaining good growth of more than 3 per cent in 2006 notwithstanding the downward revision of fourth-quarter growth from 3.5 to 2.2 per cent.

However, much of the good news has come as a result of extraordinary levels of liquidity pouring into opportunities around the globe. To a large extent this is due to the Federal Reserve’s expansionary monetary policies early in the decade and the US administration’s fiscal stimulus. The yen carry trade has also facilitated the buoyant expansion of investments and leverage evident everywhere today. The low spreads, the tremendous build-up of liquidity, the reach for yield and the lack of differentiation among borrowers have stimulated both dynamic growth and some real concerns.

Pockets of excess are becoming harder to ignore. Problems in the housing and mortgage area such as the subprime sector in the US are one such example of excess that should come as no surprise. As lenders and investors inevitably become more discriminating, liquidity will recede and a number of problems will surface. Too many countries and companies with vastly different risk profiles are still commanding similar pricing.

It has been my experience that periods of economic expansion tend to last between five and seven years. We are entering the sixth year of expansion in the US. Against that background, I believe that over the next 12 months a market correction will occur and this time it will be a real correction. I said as much last spring during the Inter-American Development Bank meetings in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Soon afterwards, in May 2006, the markets did experience a correction but it was so mild and short-lived that it was in a way less effective than no correction at all. I say that because it left the inexperienced with the impression that it would be smooth sailing from there on.

Market developments in the past few weeks should be seen as a warning. What has been evident for a number of months is that, in the US, we are seeing lagging inflation and slower growth. Whether this means that we are going to have to fend off recessionary tendencies is not yet clear. However, what is clear to me is that in the next year a material correction in the markets will occur.

During the last big adjustment that started in July 1997 in Thailand and spread to a number of Asian economies including South Korea, followed by Russia in 1998 – and led ultimately to the bail-out of Long Term Capital Management, the US hedge fund – a number of today’s large market operat­ors were not yet in the mix.

Today, hedge funds, private equity and those involved in credit derivatives play important, and as yet largely untested, roles. The primary worry of many who make or regulate the market is not inflation or growth or interest rates, but instead the coming adjustment and the possible destabilising effect these new players could have on the functioning of international markets as liquidity recedes. It is also possible that they could provide relief for markets that face shortages of liquidity.

Either way, this clearly is the time to exercise greater prudence in lending and in investing and to resist any temptation to relax standards.

Friday, March 23, 2007

Countrywide sees record foreclosures

The Associated Press March 22, 2007, 4:47PM EST

A top executive at Countrywide Financial Corp. said Thursday that dropping home prices could produce record-high levels of foreclosures on loans made in 2006 to people with poor credit histories.

Sandy Samuels, executive managing director and chief legal officer of the Calabasas, Calif.-based mortgage lender, said in prepared remarks to the Senate Banking Committee that foreclosure rates on high-risk, or subprime, mortgages taken out last year may approach or exceed the level for similar loans taken out in 2000, when the foreclosure rate was nearly 10 percent.

However, Samuels urged Congress not to "lose sight of the reality that more than 90 percent of Countrywide's subprime borrowers will not lose their homes to foreclosure."

Samuels also warned lawmakers not to create overly tight restrictions on high-risk mortgages, saying that could lock out many would-be homebuyers.

Over the past 10 years, Countrywide's overall foreclosure rate for adjustable rate subprime loans was 3.4 percent, Samuels said. The so-called subprime mortgage market represents 7 percent of Countrywide's home loan volume, compared with 20 percent of the overall U.S. market, he said.

Samuels' testimony came as federal regulators said they lacked authority over expanding areas of the high-risk mortgage market, and as lawmakers pressed them on whether they were lax and helped fuel the spike in delinquent payments and foreclosures.

Anxiety that a blowup among subprime mortgage lenders could spill over into the broader economy has roiled the financial markets in recent weeks. New Century Financial Corp., the nation's second-largest subprime mortgage lender, has scrambled to stay afloat as banks cut off funding because of a failure to make payments.

Earlier this week, Fremont General Corp. said it would sell $4 billion in subprime residential real estate loans at a loss. And last Friday, Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co. announced plans to sell $2.7 billion of loans at a discount to satisfy margin calls from its lenders and stave off a liquidity crisis caused by rising defaults.

Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., the banking committee's chairman, laid out what he called a "chronology of regulatory neglect" as banks and other lenders loosened their standards for making riskier mortgage loans during the housing market boom in late 2003 and early 2004.

Dodd blamed the Federal Reserve and other regulators for setting off the crisis in subprime loans, which are higher-priced home loans for people with tarnished credit or low incomes who are considered at greater risk of default. Now, some 2.2 million homeowners could lose their homes in the next few years, said Dodd, a contender for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008.

"Our nation's financial regulators were supposed to be the cops on the beat, protecting hardworking Americans from unscrupulous financial actors," Dodd said. "Yet they were spectators for far too long. "

Foreclosures have accelerated in recent months, especially among homeowners who took out subprime loans, raising worries that many people could lose their homes as mortgage delinquencies mount.

Shares of Countrywide fell 57 cents, or 1.5 percent, to close at $36.38 on the New York Stock Exchange, where those of Fremont General dropped 83 cents, or 8 percent, to close at $9.36.

Shares of Accredited Home Lenders rose 61 cents to close at $12.57 on the Nasdaq Stock Market.